The Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2020, recently enacted as Division EE of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, included Section 214 offering employers new options related to flexible spending accounts (FSAs) for health care and dependent care expenses. IMA summarized these changes here on January 6, 2021, but as a quick recap, employers could decide whether to allow any/all of the following:
On Thursday, February 18, 2021, the IRS issued clarifying guidance in IRS Notice 2021-15 with more details for implementing these § 214 options, along with extending a couple of additional provisions employers can also have available to them. Always keep in mind that none of these provisions allows employees to just cash out their flexible spending accounts. At the end of the day, valid claims must still be submitted for reimbursement.
First, we note the IRS is allowing employers the option to have employees change their medical, dental, and vision plan elections in 2021 without a qualifying event (the IRS had allowed this in Notice 2020-29 last year, but it didn’t extend into 2021). An employer interested in offering this should first get approval from their insurer or stop loss insurer. Once approval is secured, the employer could offer one or more of the following:
Similar to how this worked in 2020, employers may limit the period during which election changes may be made.
Next, we note the IRS is allowing extra time to make amendments to health FSAs (and HRAs if they’re impacted) to allow reimbursement of over-the-counter medications without a prescription and menstrual products retroactive to January 1, 2020. The CARES Act allows these to be eligible expenses for reimbursement retroactively to January 1, 2020, but hadn’t explicitly granted extra time past 2020 to adopt amendments. Now employers that were unable to get those amendments in place in 2020 have extra time.
Finally, we get into the clarifications of the § 214 FSA flexibilities offered in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021. Note that an employer may exercise any available amendments with respect to each type of FSA they sponsor, and can adopt different provisions for their different FSAs (such as one set of changes or no changes to their health FSA, another set of changes or no changes to their LPFSA, and yet another set of changes or no changes to their daycare FSA).
Similar to how this worked under IRS Notice 2020-29, the employer may:
Election changes cannot be retroactive. However, if someone enrolls for the first time under this provision (perhaps because funds have been made newly available under a carryover or grace period that requires them to elect a minimum amount for the new year, or perhaps they have had a change in circumstances that isn’t a qualifying event so they’d like to enroll now), the employer could permit them to submit claims for reimbursement retroactive to the start of the plan year that began on/after January 1, 2021.
We left this one for last (and thus out of order from the list above) as it’s not likely to be overly relevant to most employers.
Some employers may be interested in the option to allow employees the rest of the plan year (plus any normal or extended grace period) to incur claims for reimbursement by the health FSA after termination without having to elect and pay for COBRA. The employer can limit what’s available under this provision so the employee can only be reimbursed valid claims to the amount the employee has already contributed. If an employer adopts this provision for terminating employees or a class of terminating employees, the employer is still obligated to provide the COBRA notice for underspent FSAs, since they can have access to the entire annual election amount.
If an employer is not interested in this and will only offer COBRA for underspent health FSAs subject to the individual paying a premium, the IRS reminds employers that COBRA premiums can no longer be charged for the health FSA once the current plan year closes and the beneficiary enters a grace period. This is often a reason why employers will insist on a minimum health FSA election amount in the new year in order to have access to grace period funds…it helps avoid the need to offer a grace period to health FSA beneficiaries on COBRA.
IMA will continue to monitor regulator guidance and offer meaningful, practical, timely information.
This material should not be considered as a substitute for legal, tax and/or actuarial advice. Contact the appropriate professional counsel for such matters. These materials are not exhaustive and are subject to possible changes in applicable laws, rules, and regulations and their interpretations.